MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111337362 · doi:10.47852/bonviewaia52025860

Effective Denoising of Epileptic High-Frequency Oscillations (HFOs) in Scalp EEG Using a Temporal Generative Adversarial Network (TimeGAN)

2025· article· W7111337362 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsElectroencephalographyScalpPattern recognition (psychology)Artifact (error)Noise reductionConvolutional neural networkNoise (video)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past two decades, High-Frequency Oscillations (HFOs) have been widely recognized as promising biomarkers for delineating the specific regions of the brain responsible for seizure onset, and for monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of epileptogenic activity. While deep learning (DL) techniques have shown promise in processing HFOs in intracranial EEG (iEEG) data, they often struggle to perform effectively on scalp electroencephalography (EEG). This limitation is particularly owing to the inherently lower signal-to-noise ratio of scalp HFOs, their smaller amplitude, and their increased susceptibility to artifact contamination, which together obscure subtle high-frequency phenomena. Despite these restrictions or barriers, clinicians predominantly rely on scalp EEG recordings due to their noninvasive nature, low cost, and recognized safety. To extend the benefits or applicability of DL-based HFO detection to a broader patient population, automated scalp EEG systems incorporating HFO denoising algorithms are highly warranted and necessary. Hence, the present study aimed at proposing, developing, and comparing the effectiveness of five optimized DL-based paradigms for denoising unwanted artifacts from realistic scalp EEG. The target data was created by combining intracranial HFO samples with injected realistic contaminants such as electrooculogram (EOG) and electromyography (EMG), accurately replicating scalp EEG profiles. In this regard, we considered evaluating and comparing the following time-series DL architectures, referred to as: one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN-1D), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Stacked Autoencoders (SAE), one-dimensional Transformer (Transformer-1D), and Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). This analysis aims to elucidate each model’s denoising performance strengths and weaknesses. The reached quantitative and qualitative experimental results revealed that the proposed current GAN model significantly achieved superior performance compared to other DL approaches, suggesting its effectiveness as a robust solution for denoising scalp HFOs, thereby enhancing noninvasive HFOs detection. Received: 7 April 2025 | Revised: 15 August 2025 | Accepted: 30 September 2025 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement Data were available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Author Contribution Statement Sahbi Chaibi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration. Wadhah Ayadi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation. Abdennaceur Kachouri: Validation, Supervision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence and ApplicationsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207