KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present cosmic shear constraints from the completed Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), where the cosmological parameter $ S_8\equiv\sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3} = 0.815^{+0.016}_{-0.021} $ is found to be in agreement (0.73σ) with results from the Planck Legacy cosmic microwave background experiment. The final KiDS footprint spans 1347 square degrees of deep nine-band imaging across the optical and near-infrared (NIR), along with an extra 23-square degrees of KiDS-like calibration observations of deep spectroscopic surveys. Improvements in our redshift distribution estimation methodology, combined with our enhanced calibration data and multi-band image simulations, allowed us to extend our lensed sample out to a photometric redshift of zB ≤ 2.0. Compared to previous KiDS analyses, the increased survey area and redshift depth results in a ∼32% improvement in constraining power in terms of $ \Sigma_8\equiv\sigma_8\left(\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}/0.3\right)^\alpha = 0.821^{+0.014}_{-0.016} $, where α = 0.58 has been optimised to match the revised degeneracy direction of σ8 and Ωm for our current survey at higher redshift. We adopted a new physically motivated intrinsic alignment (IA) model that jointly depends on the galaxy sample’s halo mass and spectral type distributions, and which is informed by previous direct alignment measurements. We also marginalised over our uncertainty on the impact of baryon feedback on the non-linear matter power spectrum. Compared to previous KiDS analyses, we conclude that the increase seen in S8 primarily results from our improved redshift distribution estimation and calibration, as well as a new survey area and improved image reduction. Our companion paper presents a full suite of internal and external consistency tests (including joint constraints with other datasets), finding the KiDS-Legacy dataset to be the most internally robust sample produced by KiDS to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".