Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is focused on the impact and influence of Dr. Donald D. Horward on studies of the French Revolution and First Empire from 1960-present. It can be used as a lens to understand the development, expansion, and contraction of research, publications, graduate student production, academic dialogue, and outside private interest in the two fields. The study marks the importance of Dr. Horward’s influence on international cooperation and dialogue within the field of Napoleonic studies. It highlights how that influence led to the involvement of national governments in projects dedicated to their history, particularly in France, England, Spain, and Portugal. Horward was the primary engine behind combined academic efforts to expand the reach of military history within studies of Napoleonic Europe. Horward’s expertise, particularly in the Peninsular War, eventually caught the eye of the U.S. military and established a unique link between academia and various service branch schools, not the least of which was West Point, for a quarter century thereafter. This relationship strengthened and burgeoned into a dynamic sector within the broader field of Napoleonic studies, as these soldier-scholars not only taught future army officers, but developed into academics in their own right. Finally, Dr. Horward was a major catalyst driving the private funding pumped into the field in the last two decades of the 20th century, just as the fields reached their high tide in production and interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".