MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111438786

Tests of Faith: Race, Religion & Gender During the Civil War Era

2025· article· W7111438786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil War Book Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsFaithSpanish Civil WarWhite (mutation)Civil religionProtestantismMilitarismRacism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1850 to 1865 American Christians used their faith to make sense of the political and militaristic events that unfolded in their lives. The Fugitive Slave act set the tone for the Christian use of faith and theology as a means of interpreting the political moment. Ministers’ responses to the law set a precedent for religious culture in America. They proved that religion could become an analytical frame of reference, and that their faith could put them at odds with those who held opposing views. Black Christians used both their lived racial experiences and their theological imaginations to interpret the political moments surrounding them. They read their lives into the fugitive slaves of the Bible. After the Fugitive Slave Act, a minority of Black Christians who favored fleeing the nation matched their faith in God with their desire to leave the nation. The scriptures gave them a set of biblical characters and people groups to situate their own existence and in the decade leading up to the Civil War, they used the Bible to justify departures into Canada and Liberia. Black Christians supported colonization not just in the name of self-determination or political freedom, but out of a religious conviction that God wanted them to do it. At the commencement of the Civil War, Black and white Christians continued using the lens of religion to make sense of the present. The Civil War era was a marked period of hypermasculine violence. White ministers used masculine biblical allusions to explain the sectional rift. They made the war a battle to protect vulnerable women and children while emphasizing the importance of level-headed men at home and on the battlefield. Black ministers used their religious interpretations of the war to stifle frustrations over their lack of access to the masculine arena of war. Even though they failed to enter the war as men, they still wielded patriarchal authority over Black women, children, and non-fighting men by establishing gendered behavioral expectations within the community. White ministers also set rigid behavioral expectations for women, children, and non-fighting men. In 1863, the war took a turn towards emancipation and Black and white Christians used their faith to interpret this political moment as well. Emancipation became a millennial moment ushering in Christ’s reign on Earth. Northern Christians supported emancipation not just because of human rights interests or legal arguments. They supported it because they believed God wanted them to do so. By the final year of the war Black Christians again used their religious understandings of the war to justify and sanctify war violence. They used the Bible and images of God’s vengeance to legitimize their own willingness to die and kill for the Union. The major legislative and political moments from 1850 to 1865 reveal a prominent pattern among Christians to use their faith during moments of political and social uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil War Book ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207