The Study of Liao City in the Inner Mongolia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[[abstract]]內蒙古為遼代根源之地，近來考古發掘有助於歷史之研究。在內蒙古有遼之上京、中京，由蒐集之考古資料探討遼代城市建設之情形，發現分為五個等級之城市規模與其品級並無絕對之關係，城市之外形多為長方形與方形，方向多為南向，護城河、甕城、角樓、馬面等設置並無定制，且與城市之規模無顯著關係，但角樓、馬面之間距則通常有其規則；而城市之地理位置多為沿河建城。 The Inner Mongolia was the origination of Liao dynasty. Numerous archaeological uncovering and inquiry of recent time have being available for historical research. This treatise try to discuss the Liao dynasty in Inner Mongolia, there's upper and middle capital, from some part of its city remainder to research its model and establishment. The materials we have collected graded as five levels of cities. We find that the size of the city have nothing to do with the official title of the magistrate. The arrangement of the city was outlined as rectangular or True Square and the orientation of the city were mostly southward. The fashion of their ditch, outer protecting wall, turret and horse face were varied and in no accordance with the class of the city. The orientation of outer protecting wall and its distance from the horse face were generally in accordance to the rule of the time, and the location of the city was mostly beside the river.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".