MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111678910

Whales Without Borders: Aligning Environmental Policies to Enhance Whale Conservation in the Salish Sea

2025· article· en· W7111678910 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhaleEndangered speciesWhalingPopulationHabitatFishingPredationMarine ecosystemForaging
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Salish Sea is a biologically diverse ecosystem which is home to at least six species of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises). This inland sea supports seasonal booms of numerous cetacean prey species, including Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), and ghost shrimp (Palaemonetes paludosus), making the Salish Sea an important foraging ground for cetaceans (Gaydos & Pearson, 2011; Pietsch & Orr, 2015; Quinn & Losee, 2022). Subsequently, there is designated critical habitat for two at-risk cetaceans – Southern Resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) and humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) within the Salish Sea (Figure 1). Southern Resident killer whales are listed as ‘endangered’ under both Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA) and the United States (U.S.) Endangered Species Act (ESA; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1973; Government of Canada, 2002). This population of killer whale has suffered historic declines starting in the 1960s, with currently 74 individuals remaining in the population as of April 2025. Conversely, over 1,200 individual humpback whales have been observed in the Salish Sea, consisting of whales from three distinct population segments (DPS) – Central America, Mexico, and Hawaii DPS (Martien et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2021; Malleson & Shaw, 2024). Humpback whales have been steadily increasing in numbers over the last two decades following the end of commercial whaling, however, both Southern Residents and humpback whales are facing increasing pressure from anthropogenic effects, including acoustic and physical disturbance from vessels, reduced prey availability, and persistent environmental contaminants (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2018; Sato & Wiles, 2021). Despite a total of 16 laws, seven regulations, and one treaty enacted across Canada and the U.S. to reduce these threats, the transboundary nature of the Salish Sea is challenging for ensuring sufficient overlap of protections between state, provincial, and federal measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207