MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111685094

Printmaking in eighteenth-century Naples: Picturing, recording, communicating in the Southern Italian Enlightenment (1734-1799)

2025· other· en· W7111685094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrintmakingContext (archaeology)EnlightenmentPeriod (music)PoliticsSuccessor cardinalState (computer science)EmpireQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the production of prints in Naples between 1734 and 1799, a period in large part coinciding with the Neapolitan Enlightenment. Following the collapse of the Spanish Empire and the wars of succession to the Spanish and Polish thrones, in 1734 southern Italy was created an independent kingdom (Kingdom of the Two Sicilies) with Naples as its capital. With independence, printmaking was seen as an instrument to implement political and economic reforms and, ultimately, to improve the social conditions of the new nation. King Charles of Bourbon (1710–88) and his successor Ferdinand (1751–1825), state officials, and local reformers actively engaged with the medium to this end. This thesis is not about the variety of images produced in Naples in the 1700s, but about the culturally loaded instrumentalization of the technology. Case studies include Le Antichità di Ercolano Esposte (Naples, Stamperia Reale, 1757–92), the monumental publication commissioned by the crown illustrating the finds of Herculaneum and Pompeii, the publishing activities of Raimondo di Sangro, Prince of Sansevero (1710–71) and of the printmaker-turned-publisher Filippo Morghen (1730–1807), vulcanological treatises, and the production of views of the last quarter of the century. These objects are analysed in the context of centre-periphery debates, cultural contact, the rise of the modern nation, the relationship between art and science in the early modern period, and the southern question in Italy. The dissertation shows how in eighteenth-century Naples prints were used to close the perceived cultural and temporal gap between Naples and other European nations. This dissertation thus aims to complicate and expand narratives of printmaking as a central element in the development of modernity, shedding light on the little-examined play of cultural relations among European countries and broadening our understanding of the Enlightenment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)French-language works237,207