AS-982-24 Resolution on the Proposed 14-Week Trimester Calendar and Year-Round Operations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resolves that the Academic Senate objects to the proposed 14-week term length, which is presented in the 2026-2027 Academic Calendar, because it implements symmetrical fall, winter, and spring term lengths that modify, without senate consultation and approval, the sixteen-week fall and spring semester term lengths and asymmetrical summer term in AS-942-22; and further resolves that the Academic Senate strongly encourages the administration to postpone the adoption of symmetric trimesters proposed in the 2026-2027 Academic Calendar until Cal Poly has had the opportunity to institute the Quarter to Semester transition as it originally was mandated by the Chancellor’s Office in 2021, with two 15-week Semesters with one week of final exams and a Summer semester; and further resolves that the Academic Senate strongly encourages the administration to postpone implementation of the Year-Round Operations proposal until the integration with Cal Maritime, should it be approved by the CSU Board of Trustees in November 2024, is complete and has been shown to be both financially and functionally sustainable, and the incoming community from Cal Maritime has had an opportunity to provide feedback on the proposal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it