MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111754888

Screening Candidate Fungicides for Control of Chalkbrood Disease in Alfalfa Leafcutting Bees, <i>Megachile rotundata</i> (F.) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

2007· article· W7111754888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · 2007
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFungicideFungusSporeFungal diseaseBiological pest controlPollenLarvaConidium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pollination of alfalfa seed crops is done primarily by managed populations of the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata (F.). One of the biggest problems associated with managing M. rotundata on a commercial scale is a fungal disease called chalkbrood, caused by Ascosphaera aggregata Skou. The disease infects larvae that have consumed pollen and nectar contaminated with fungal spores. The spores germinate in the bee's gut, spreading hyphae throughout the host and killing the bee. Mortality from chalkbrood is regularly 10% to 35% in the northwestern United States, and infection levels in excess of 50% are not uncommon. As a consequence, alfalfa seed growers in the U.S. must supplement their bee populations annually by purchasing bees from areas of Canada with very low chalkbrood levels. The objectives of this thesis were to 1) develop a series of quick, easy, and inexpensive laboratory tests to screen fungicides for possible use in chalkbrood control programs, and 2) begin identifying those fungicides showing potential for chalkbrood control for later field experiments. A prospective fungicide must have a toxic effect on the fungus without harmful effects to larval and adult stages of the bees. This study addressed the efficacy and non-target effects of four fungicides: Benlate®, Captan®, Orbit™, and Rovral®. Fungicides were evaluated in three areas: 1) effectiveness in inhibiting fungal growth in laboratory cultures of A. aggregata, 2) effects on incidence of chalkbrood and mortality in M. rotundata larvae after incorporation of fungicides into the pollen-nectar provisions, and 3) effects on adult M. rotundata mortality from contact and oral exposure to fungicides. Results of this study identified Benlate® and Rovral® as the most promising fungicides for further studies. Both reduced fungal growth and incidence of chalkbrood with minimal negative toxicological effects on larval and adult bees. Orbit™ was effective in reducing fungal growth, but did not reduce incidence of chalkbrood and was toxic to both larval and adult bees. Captan® was not effective in reducing fungal growth and chalkbrood, and was toxic to both larval and adult bees. Contact tests with treated filter paper were not useful in assessing the toxicity to adult bees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - USU (Utah State University)Same topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207