MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111791823

La fable du troc

2020· article· W7111791823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGraduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFablePost colonialismPrologue
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 13 e siecle a ete un moment important de rencontres des mondes.11 l' a ete dans des terres alors encore inconnues de l'Occident (pour les trappeurs anonymes du grand Nord canadien, de I' Alaska ou de la Siberie, pour l'illustre capitaine Cook dans le Pacifique, etc.), comme ailleurs en Amerique, aux Indes ou en Afrique avec !'extension de la colonisation.Alors que les explorateurs devaient se conformer aux fa9ons locales d' echanger, les colonisateurs destructuraient les systemes paleomonetaires et monetaires locaux et developpaient la troque et la traite 1 .Le 13 e siecle a ete aussi pour l'economie politique, en train de se constituer comme discipline autonome du savoir, le temps de !'invention d'une fable supposee decrire l'origine unique et uni verselle de la monnaie : le troc 2 • Cette fable du troc raconte !'invention progressive de la monnaie: tout d'abord les hommes se livrent a des echanges sporadiques et ignorent toute pratique monetaire ; puis ils acceptent de recevoir une marchandise non pas pour l'usage immediat qu'ils pourraient en avoir mais comme moyen de paiement d'une autre marchandise qu'ils convoitent; enfin ce moyen de paiement prend des formes de plus en plus standardisees.Cette fable decrit de fa9on imaginaire les origines uniquement commerciales de la monnaie et suppose que la mon naie nait des inconvenients d'une absence d'intermediaire lors du developpement des relations marchandes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGraduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)Same topicPolitical Economy and MarxismFrench-language works237,207