Transformations des politiques publiques du logement social et communautaire : effets sur leur mise en oeuvre par les actrices et acteurs du milieu de l'habitation à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La crise du logement que vit actuellement le Québec est cadrée par les pouvoirs publics comme une crise de l’abordabilité pour tous.tes. Ce discours de l’abordabilité met en lumière les inégalités croissantes liées à l’accès au logement, où les forces du marché dominent la réponse aux besoins fondamentaux des citoyen.ne.s. Ce projet de recherche s’intéresse à la réponse des pouvoirs publics à la crise et à la capacité de mise en oeuvre des politiques et programmes par les organisations non-marchandes afin de : 1. Documenter les changements importants des politiques publiques qui sont survenus dans les dernières années; 2. Documenter les effets sur les pratiques des acteurs et actrices faisant la dispensation de services en logement social et communautaire; 3. Documenter les échanges entre les pouvoirs publics et les actrices et acteurs faisant la dispensation de services en logement social et communautaire. Cette recherche n’a pas comme objectif d’évaluer la réussite ou la performance de ces politiques publiques, mais plutôt de mettre en lumière les dynamiques de pouvoir entre les pouvoirs publics et les acteurs et actrices faisant la dispensation de services en logement social et communautaire. Afin d’atteindre les objectifs listés, 13 entretiens semi-dirigés ont été réalisés avec des actrices et acteurs des pouvoirs publics, parapubliques et du tiers secteur. Les résultats présentent les enjeux identifiés par les répondant.e.s et les dynamiques de pouvoirs entre les acteurs et actrices en insistant sur les processus de communication et de négociation qui mènent à la création des politiques. The housing crisis that Quebec is currently experiencing is framed by public authorities as a crisis of affordability for all. This talk of affordability highlights the growing inequalities in access to housing, where market forces dominate the response to citizens' basic needs. This research project looks at the public authorities' response to the crisis and at the capacity of non-market organisations to implement policies and programmes in order to: 1. Document the major changes in public policy that have occurred in recent years; 2. Document the effects on the practices of actors providing social and community housing services; 3. Document the exchanges between public authorities and the players involved in providing social and community housing services. The aim of this research is not to evaluate the success or performance of these public policies, but rather to shed light on the power dynamics between the public authorities and the players involved in providing social and community housing services. In order to achieve the objectives listed, 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted with actors from public and para-public authorities and the third sector. The results present the issues identified by the respondents and the power dynamics between the actors, with an emphasis on the communication and negotiation processes that lead to the creation of policies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".