MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7111837713

Effect of protein level and essential amino acid supplementation on indicators of gut health in weaned piglets

2025· article· en· W7111837713 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLandbrugsstyrelsenNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElanco Animal HealthGrønt Udviklings- og Demonstrations ProgramEuropean Agricultural Fund for Rural DevelopmentMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en VoedselkwaliteitCHIST-ERAH. Wilhelm Schaumann StiftungRoyal De HeusJunta de AndalucíaCanada First Research Excellence FundBundesamt für LandwirtschaftEvonik OperationsUniversité François-RabelaisBundesministerium für Ernährung und LandwirtschaftVereniging Diervoederonderzoek NederlandU.S. Department of AgricultureMitacsUniversity of AlbertaEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNarodowym Centrum NaukiNational Institute of Food and AgricultureNovo NordiskUniversità degli Studi di MilanoGeneralitat de CatalunyaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAgentschap Innoveren en OndernemenAarhus UniversitetDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNovalaitConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoVlaamse regeringBeef Farmers of OntarioSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungBeef Cattle Research CouncilTexas Tech UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCecumValineAmino acidFecesMetaboliteEssential amino acidTryptophanMethionineSmall intestineLeucine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementing with extra essential amino acids (EAA) may reduce the occurrence of post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) associated with high-protein diets. Sloth et al. (2022) found a reduction in PWD treatment days by more than 50% when supplementing 35% extra crystalline lysine-HCl above the ideal protein profile with corresponding increases in methionine, threonine, tryptophan and valine by 32%, 62%, 22% and, 67%, respectively (Sloth et al., 2022). In the current study, 120 weaners (~28d old) housed four piglets per pen, were fed one of three diets: Lp (15% crude protein (CP)), Hp (25% CP), and HpEAA (Hp with EAA supplementation according to (Sloth et al., 2022)) for four weeks. Individual body weight and feed intake (FI) per pen were registered weekly. Faeces from each pen were scored daily for diarrhoea. On d7 and 28 post-weaning (PW), 10 piglets per dietary group were euthanized to sample digesta from stomach (STO), distal small intestine (SI3), cecum (CAE), proximal (CO1), mid (CO2), and distal (CO3) colon for bacterial quantification and microbial metabolite analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess statistical differences. From week 2, Lp piglets (9-17%) had a lower probability of diarrhoea than Hp (65-91%) and HpEAA (43-62%) (P≤0.02), and from week 3, HpEAA (43-50%) had lower probability than Hp (65-71%) (P≤0.03). On d28 PW, Hp and HpEAA piglets had higher branched-chain fatty acid concentrations in CO2 and CO3 (P≤0.04) compared to Lp. Further, both Hp groups showed higher hydrogen sulphide concentration in the CAE (P≤0.01), while Hp piglets had a higher concentration than Lp in CO2 (P=0.01), with HpEAA being intermediate. Additionally, lactic acid concentration was higher in STO and SI3 (P≤0.009) in HpEAA piglets compared to the other groups. Quantification of E. coli in digesta showed that Hp and HpEAA groups had higher log copies /g sample (P≤0.04) compared to Lp in CAE and CO1 on d7 PW. Hp and HpEAA also tended (P≤0.09) to have more Lactobacilli in CAE on d28. Piglets fed Hp had the highest average daily gain (0.379kg/day) overall, followed by HpEAA (0.314kg/day) and Lp (0.281kg/day), with an LSD of 0.089 kg/day. HpEAA piglets had the lowest average daily FI at 326g/day, compared to 424g/day for Hp and 427g/day for Lp. The gain-to-feed ratio was higher in both Hp groups (P<0.01), compared to Lp. Although, this study was not designed to conclude on production results, the effect of protein- and amino acid levels on performance parameters and diarrhoea occurrence align with those of Sloth et al. (2022). While some metabolites may provide insights into the observed difference in diarrhoea, bacterial quantification and metabolite analyses did not fully explain the underlying mechanisms, warranting further data exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→