МЕТАФОРИЧНА КОНЦЕПТУАЛІЗАЦІЯ ПОДОРОЖНЬОГО НАРАТИВУ У СПОГАДАХ ДЖЕНІС КУЛИК-КІФЕР «МЕД І ПОПІЛ»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the metaphorical conceptualization of travel narratives in Janice Kulyk Keefer’s memoir Honey and Ashes, employing cognitive-linguistic tools to analyze how the author’s physical journey mirrors an interior exploration of identity, belonging, and heritage. It applies the framework of Lakoff and Johnson’s conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual integration (or blending) theory (as developed by Fauconnier and Turner) to the analysis of the interplay between the source domain of travel and the target domain of narrative. The analysis reveals that Keefer’s journey—spanning from Canada to her ancestral village in Ukraine—serves as a metaphorical bridge between past and present, with the memoir’s structure reflecting the cognitive processes of memory and self-discovery. Key conceptual mappings include the traveler as narrator, the road map as stories, and destinations as chapters, illustrating how the metaphor “NARRATIVE IS TRAVEL” shapes the text’s meaning. The study highlights Keefer’s dual role as both observer and subject, as she grapples with questions of cultural identity and belonging. Through contextual and interpretative analysis, the article demonstrates how metaphorical expressions in the memoir activate deeper cognitive structures, enabling readers to construct coherent mental models of the narrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".