Les organismes communautaires québécois LGBTQ2+ : pratiques de terrain, utilisation des connaissances issues de la recherche et engagement dans la production de ces connaissances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les organismes communautaires québécois LGBTQ2+ : pratiques de terrain, utilisation des connaissances issues de la recherche et engagement dans la production de ces connaissances Chaire de recherche sur la diversité sexuelle et la pluralité des genres (2022-2023)Agissant à la frontière de l'État et de la société civile, les organismes, les associations ou les groupes communautaires jouent un rôle crucial pour la défense des droits et l'arrimage des soins et services destinés aux populations défavorisées ou marginalisées.Cette infographie brosse un portrait des actions des organismes, associations ou groupes communautaires québécois LGBTQ2+ et des défis qu'ils rencontrent dans la pleine réalisation de leur mission, qu'elle consiste à soutenir la défense, collective ou individuelle, des droits LGBTQ2+ ou encore à mettre en place des conditions qui la soutiennent.Cette infographie présente aussi les pratiques d'utilisation des connaissances de ces organismes, associations ou groupes, ainsi que leur participation à la production de ces connaissances et les obstacles qui limitent cette participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".