Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rezensionen zu: Philipp Höhn: Kaufleute in Konflikt. Rechtspluralismus, Kredit und Gewalt im spätmittelalterlichen Lübeck . Aus der Reihe „Schwächediskurse und Ressourcenregime | Discourses of Weakness & Resource Regimes“ Campus Verlag 2021, Frankfurt/New York. 429 Seiten, 45 Euro Helge Kminek, Franziska Bank, Leon Fuchs (Hrsg.): Kontroverses Miteinander. Interdisziplinäre und kontroverse Positionen zur Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Erziehungswissenschaft, Band 23 Goethe-Universität – FB04, Dekanat 2020 212 Seiten, 8,99 Euro Rainer Forst und Klaus Günther (Hrsg.): Normative Ordnungen. Suhrkamp 2021, Berlin. 683 Seiten, 25 Euro Friedrich Stummel, Ludwig Kohaupt Eigenwertaufgaben in Hilbertschen Räumen. Mit Aufgaben und vollständigen Lösungen. Logos Verlag 2021, Berlin. 302 Seiten, 29 Euro Barrie Axford and Manfred B. Steger (eds.): Populism and Globalization ProtoSociology Vol. 37/2020, Frankfurt am Main. 267 Seiten, 49,50 Euro Brock, Lothar und Hendrik Simon (eds.): The Justification of War and International Order. From Past to Present. Oxford University Press 2021, Oxford. 539 Seiten, 109,50 Euro
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.674 | 0.654 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".