MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112422183

A Novel Combination of Mycielski-Markov, Regime Switching and Jump Diusion Models for Solar Energy

2021· article· en· W7112422183 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemSolar irradianceSolar energyIrradianceGridCalibrationScale (ratio)Solar power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With renewable energy sources growing, solar power generation is becoming ever more popular around the world, so forecasting and scenario analysis of Solar Photovoltaic production is benecial for grid operators and investors. In this paper, we introduce a novel combination of a Mycielski-Markov model, standard regime switching, and jump diusion models to generate 1-minute Global Horizontal Irradiance time series over any time scale. It can simulate dierent scenarios of solar irradiance in the future after being trained on empirical data. We verify our model using statistical tests to compare our simulations with those from an observed time-series in Mauritius. The resulting model is able to generate simulations retaining the statistical properties of the data. Further, we nd the proposed calibration process to be robust, and identied that splitting the day into 16 periods to be perfect balance to counter overtting. The proposed model has the potential to better understand the eects of including large scale Solar Photovoltaic generation into an energy network, value future investments, or even allow for a cost-benet analysis of subsidies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207