MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112625580

AASB Research Report: Connectivity of Non-Financial Information and Financial Information - A NFP Private Sector Study

2025· report· en· W7112625580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · 2025
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredibilityStakeholderRelevance (law)Key (lock)Private sectorFocus (optics)Stakeholder engagementService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research report investigates the connectivity between financial and non-financial information in the Australian not-for-profit (NFP) private sector, with a particular focus on the relevance and application of service performance reporting (SPR). The report draws on literature reviews, annual report analysis, surveys, and stakeholder focus groups to evaluate current reporting practices, stakeholder perceptions and practical pathways for improving integration, accessibility, and credibility of SPR across the sector. Key messages include:<br/>• Connectivity between financial and non-financial information remains fragmented across the NFP sector, with limited integration and inconsistent terminology.<br/>• Stakeholders (including donors, regulators, preparers, auditors, and directors) recognise the value of SPR but highlight challenges around implementation costs, capacity constraints, assurance gaps, and the need for flexible reporting guidance.<br/>• International case studies (e.g., New Zealand, United Kingdom, Canada) illustrate varied models of SPR, offering insights into balancing comparability, contextualisation, and proportionality.<br/>A successful SPR framework for Australia must be scalable, principles-based, and informed by stakeholder perspectives to ensure it is both credible and context-sensitive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA)French-language works237,207