Key words: Lower Carniolan dialect group, South White Carniolan dialect, Srednji Radenci, Sodevci, Dečina, Prelesje, transitional speech, dialectology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magistrsko delo obravnava južnobelokranjsko narečje, ki sinhrono spada v dolenjsko narečno skupino. Prispevek predstavlja na novo zbrano narečno gradivo v izbranih krajih ob reki Kolpi, za katera se ugotavlja genealoška povezanost s kajkavskim narečjem hrvaškega jezika. Na terenu zbrano narečno gradivo se primerja z govori, ki se na hrvaški strani slovensko-hrvaške državne meje uvrščajo v kajkavsko narečno skupino. V teoretičnem delu sem na kratko opisala zgodovinske raziskave o belokranjskih govorih, geografske podatke, ki so vplivale na spremembe v narečnem govoru na območju Bele krajine, značilnosti in razlike med govori ipd. V empiričnem delu sem opisala potek zbiranja in obdelave gradiva. Nato sledi kratka predstavitev posameznega govorca in vseh štirih krajev (Srednji Radenci, Sodevci, Dečina, Prelesje). Podan je jezikoslovni opis krajevnih govorov na osnovi obširnega gradiva, ki je bilo na novo zbrano. Podani so glavni glasoslovni kriteriji, ki utemeljujejo uvrstitev govorov med prehodne govore, dodana sta narečni inventar in distribucija ter tabelni prikaz glavnih issln. odrazov. Za primerjavo je dodano gradivo kontrolne točke Blaževci, ki se uvršča med vzhodnogoranske govore kajkavske narečne skupine. Na koncu so v povzetku zapisane sklepne ugotovitve narejene raziskave.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".