MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112957925

Music Heritage, Migration and Identity

2025· other· en· W7112957925 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Repository (University of Gloucestershire) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité Gustave EiffelLibera Università di BolzanoUniversité de LausanneUniversità degli Studi di TorinoUniversidad de ChileUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversità degli Studi di PaviaRijksuniversiteit GroningenNewcastle UniversityUniversità degli Studi di MilanoAustralian National UniversityRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnUniversità di PisaUniversitetet i OsloMiddle Tennessee State UniversityNorthern Arizona UniversitySouthampton Solent UniversityUniversiteit van AmsterdamUniversité LavalFlorida State UniversityUniversità di BolognaCarleton College
KeywordsActive listeningIdentity (music)ReminiscenceStorytellingDiversity (politics)Visibility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The panel draws on research that uses recorded songs, chosen by the research participants as their ‘Inheritance Tracks’, as a basis for collective listening and a prompt for the sharing of music-related reminiscences (Cohen, Grenier and Jennings, 2022; Cohen, Shaw and Waldock, 2022; Gardner and Hansen, 2024; Cohen, Shaw, Smith and Waldock, forthcoming 2025). This use of “Inheritance Tracks” as a methodological device was devised by media studies scholar Ros Jennings and inspired by a pre-recorded segment of the weekly BBC Radio 4 programme Saturday Live (2006). The segment features a celebrity guest invited to talk about and play excerpts from their two ‘inheritance tracks’: a piece of music—a song or “track” that they have inherited and one that they would like to pass on to others: (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02p8zrg/episodes/downloads). Cohen, Shaw and Waldock used Inheritance Tracks as a prompt for remembering and storytelling when working with groups of older adults at community-based care facilities in the city of Liverpool. Through collaboration with Smith and Liverpool’s Yemeni, Ukrainian and Chilean communities, they subsequently adapted this method for research on music heritage, migration and identity. The main aims of this research, which began during the COVID pandemic, are to generate wellbeing benefits for communities from music-related reminiscence activities that directly strengthen inter-generational ties; enhance the visibility of the communities within the region; and deepen understanding of local cultural diversity and heritage. Running separately but in parallel to this was Gardner’s project ‘Mapping the Music of Migration’ (2019–2021, www.mamumi.eu), which likewise used ‘Inheritance Tracks’ as a methodological devise to investigate storytelling about music and its potential to enable intercultural exchange. The project involved partners from seven European countries and resulted in a collection of migrants’ ‘Song Stories’ – personal stories about music – that were made publicly available through an interactive app.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Repository (University of Gloucestershire)French-language works237,207