La réhabilitation de l’édenté complet mandibulaire par prothèse complète amovible sur implants chez le patient atteint de diabète de type 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: the objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the reliability of implant-supported rehabilitation of the fully edentulous mandible using a mandibular complete removable prosthesis in patients with type 2 diabetes (TD2) (both controlled and uncontrolled), by assessing implant survival and success rates, as well as peri-implant clinical and radiological parameters of the implants supporting these prostheses. Methods: an electronic search was conducted on four databases,from December 2024 to April 2025. Manual searches were also included. Twelve studies were selected out of the 78 initial results. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool “RoB 2” for randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for retrospective and prospective studies. Results: the 12 included articles allowed the evaluation of over 953 implants supporting mandibular implant-retained overdentures complete removable denture on implants (PACSI). The study results reported satisfactory survival and success rates in controlled T2DM patients (HbA1c ≤ 8%), similar to those found in non-diabetic populations. In uncontrolled T2DM patients (HbA1c > 8%), no apparent correlation was found between glycated hemoglobin levels and implant survival rates. Survival and success rates were also satisfactory in this group. Clinical and radiological parameters were clinically acceptable in both controlled and uncontrolled T2DM patients. However, the results showed a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss, probing depth, and bleeding on probing between controlled and uncontrolled patients. Conclusion: this review confirms the feasibility of using dental implants to support a mandibular complete removable prosthesis in patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of glycemic level. Strict glycemic control, rigorous planning, and periodontal maintenance contribute to better peri-implant outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".