MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7113196292

Investigating Neuropsychological and Mental Health Outcomes After Surgical Intervention in Pediatric Moyamoya Vasculopathy

2025· other· en· W7113196292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoyamoya diseaseNeuropsychologyAnxietyRevascularizationIntervention (counseling)Pediatric strokeMental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV), a rare and progressive cerebrovascular disorder, is an important cause of pediatric stroke. This retrospective study explored post-revascularization neuropsychological and mental health outcomes. Eighteen patients from the Canadian Pediatric Stroke Registry at the Hospital for Sick Children (MAge=10, SD=4.073) who had revascularization surgery and completed neuropsychological assessments between 2012 and 2024 were selected. Outcome measures included academics, executive functioning, and mental health. Predictor variables were age at revascularization surgery, age at stroke/moyamoya diagnosis, and moyamoya diagnosis (confirmed or presumed). Two significant associations emerged: a strong positive relationship for children with a moyamoya diagnosis and caregiver-reported BASC-3 anxiety scores; and a strong positive correlation between moyamoya diagnosis and caregiver-reported BRIEF2 BRI total score. Age at revascularization and moyamoya diagnosis significantly predicted BRIEF2 caregiver-reported BRI total scores. These preliminary findings suggest our selected variables may predict caregiver and self-reported behavioural dysregulation and anxiety, requiring early intervention and ongoing support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→