← Back to cohort
The Double-Edged Sword of Institutional Support: Balancing International Intensity and Sustainability in Emerging Economy Firms
Bibliographic record
VenueUWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHEC MontréalCalifornia State University, StanislausCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityKauno Technologijos UniversitetasUniversität InnsbruckUniversity of Texas at El PasoKwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversidad de La SabanaXiamen UniversityFuzhou UniversityUniversidade Federal de PernambucoPeking UniversityUniversität LeipzigIndian Institute of Technology BombayLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenQingdao UniversityAston UniversitySichuan UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PaviaUniversity at BuffaloRenmin University of ChinaTongji UniversityIndiana University EastQueen's UniversityTartu ÜlikoolZhejiang UniversityAalto-YliopistoUniversidade de São PauloKookmin UniversityIndian Institute of Management AhmedabadChinese Academy of SciencesUniversidade de PernambucoEberhard Karls Universität TübingenShandong UniversityHong Kong Baptist UniversityLingnan UniversityUniversity of ReadingCopenhagen Business SchoolUniversity of SouthamptonYuhanUniversity of SussexSan José State UniversityHankuk University of Foreign StudiesIndiana University SoutheastManchester Metropolitan UniversityLanzhou UniversityJohn Carroll UniversityItä-Suomen YliopistoNanyang Technological UniversityUniversity of LeedsAugusta UniversityPepperdine UniversityTemple UniversityNational Taiwan UniversityArizona State UniversityNova Southeastern UniversitySan Diego State UniversityUniversidade FeevaleSzkoła Główna Handlowa w WarszawieKennesaw State UniversityCity University of New YorkUniversity of HullUniversidade do Vale do ItajaíMichigan State UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroCentral University of Finance and EconomicsFlorida Atlantic UniversityGeorgia State UniversityYonsei UniversityUniversity of OklahomaAuckland University of Technology, New ZealandUniversity of PretoriaGeorge Washington UniversityRice UniversityUniversidad EAFITHeriot-Watt UniversityVrije Universiteit AmsterdamUniversity of South FloridaSingapore Management UniversityFlorida International UniversityFudan UniversityAjou UniversityUniversidad del AtlánticoUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of BristolNorthumbria UniversityWayne State UniversityAix-Marseille UniversitéAnhui UniversityFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityWashburn University
KeywordsSustainabilityEmerging marketsSWORDIntensity (physics)Production (economics)
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.748
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno