MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113418269

Conflicthantering in de academische wereld:kan het anders?

2025· other· W7113418269 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueVU Research Portal · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulpitGermanCloister
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De academische wereld is – net als vrijwel elke andere omgeving waarin mensen samenwerken – niet immuun voor conflicten. Om deze tegen te gaan, wordt vaak ingezet op het opstellen van gedragscodes en het aanstellen van vertrouwenspersonen. Maar is er ook een andere, wellicht effectievere manier om met conflicten om te gaan?<br/><br/>Luister naar deze uitzending van Het Criminologiecollege, een podcastserie van het NSCR: https://app.springcast.fm/player/episode/178102?theme=springcast

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1160.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVU Research PortalFrench-language works237,207