MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113554606

Co-producing a film showcasing the dental experiences of community returners (Ex-offenders)

2023· article· en· W7113554606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStakeholderEconomic JusticeHealth carePromotion (chess)Oral historySet (abstract data type)Oral healthHealth promotionPerception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Background:<br/><br/></b>The oral health of over 90,000 individuals in UK prisons is four times worse than the general population. A recent scoping review on the oral health of prisoners inside the justice system highlighted the lack of research about what happens when they transition out of prison to become community returners.<br/><br/><b>Objectives:<br/></b><br/>To co-produce a film to showcase the dental experiences of community returners to stimulate conversation, change perceptions and inform oral health research priorities.<br/><br/><b>Methods:<br/></b><br/>Five community returners, recruited through third sector organisations, attended virtual workshops. The first workshop designed the storyboard; community returners incorporated their own stories into fictional characters to portray their lived experiences. They developed the character stories and wrote the script in the second workshop. A community film production company used professional actors who had contact with the justice system to produce the film. Following Health Research Authority guidance, this stakeholder involvement project did not require Research Ethics Approval.<br/><br/><b>Results:<br/></b><br/>The final film, titled “My Story, My Words, My Mouth” explored themes such as self-care oral health behaviours, dental care provision in prison, access to healthcare, stigmatisation, disclosure and improving oral health to support societal reintegration. The film will be aired at a screening event for stakeholders collating feedback from filmed interviews. The feedback and content of the film will be used to set research priorities for this population.<br/><br/><b>Conclusion:<br/></b><br/>Co-production can be an empowering platform to hear the voices of community returners. The film is an oral health promotion tool to provoke discussion and actively involve people in research that impacts their lives. Understanding the oral health needs and experiences of community returners is fundamental to developing strategies, to set priorities and improve the oral health of this under represented group. This aligns with the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, strengthening community action. <br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)Same topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207