MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7113645596

Seismic design and evaluation of self-centering modular rocking composite sandwich wall (SC-MRCSW) system

2025· other· en· W7113645596 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designFormworkResilience (materials science)Seismic analysisStructural systemComposite numberDamperSeismic loading
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With rapid population growth worldwide and increasing urbanization, there is a growing demand for infrastructure that can be constructed quickly, while maintaining sustainability and resilience. In order to enhance the seismic resilience and constructability, this thesis introduces a novel self-centering modular rocking composite sandwich wall (SC-MRCSW) system. SC-MRCSW system consists of steel plates in-filled with concrete, where the steel plates are tied using steel bolts. The steel plates reduce the need for concrete formwork which significantly reduces the on-site constriction time, making SC-MRCSW system a highly efficient structural system for high rise application. To improve the performance of the SC-MRCSW, novel self-centering friction dampers are added to the system to ensure SC-MRCSW system can dissipate earthquake energy and self center after strong earthquake shaking. This makes SC-MRCSW system highly resilient. This thesis focuses on the seismic design of SC-MRCSW system. This is achieved using the novel Equivalent Energy Design Procedure (EEDP). Detailed numerical model of the SC-MRCSW system was developed to simulate the non-linear dynamic response of the system. The results show that SC-MRCSW system is able to achieve superior performance at different levels of earthquake shaking intensities. This thesis shows that the proposed SC-MRCSW system can be used as a reliable seismic force resisting system and can be designed efficiently using EEDP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→French-language works237,207→