Connectedness and communal thinking in a virtual borderland: Flourishing against the normative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are fourteen women situated in different higher education spaces across the globe, our microsocial realities continuously connected like networked nodes. Working as women educationalists/leaders/researchers/teachers our becoming is informed by our transdisciplinary and border crossing inquiry and experiences of journeying in and out of each other’s lives. In this chapter we draw on theory and hybridized methods, intuitively embracing the notion of ‘flourishing against the normative', each appreciating and valuing our individual contribution to our work-study-life experiences. We consciously acquaint ourselves with the human and more than human relations extending from the network nodes linking our own microsocial realities to that of others. In re-examining and sharing our worlds and our various avenues of scholarship and theoretical understandings, we have engaged in artistic processes and creative openings which emerged to consider and express our entanglements. Importantly, and with use of poetic inquiry, we convey and explore how engaging with arts-based approaches, including creating found-poems and I-poems from words, ideas and experiences that were shared, has/is serving to inform ways of knowing and learning about the self and others, and in how, being nourished through our collective efforts, we are strengthened, again. <br/><br/>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".