Le rôle de la nature dans l’acquisition de la vertu chez Aristote: la vertu naturelle et le bon naturel (euphuia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the enumeration of potential sources of virtue in the Nicomachean Ethics, X, 10, 1179b20-25 seems to set nature aside as a factor that does not depend on us, Aristotle mentions it again in the Politics. In book VII 13, Aristotle answers the question, “how does an individual become virtuous?” by saying that virtue is acquired through three elements: nature, habit and reason (φύσις, ἔθος, λόγος). The aim of this article is to clarify the importance of nature in the acquisition and development of virtue in Aristotle’s ethics through the study of the concepts of natural virtue (ἀρετὴ φυσική) and good nature (εὐφυΐα), which will allow us to show how Aristotle affirms the existence of a natural virtue, which is not the same for everyone and which, from birth, places human beings more or less far along in their ethical path towards virtue. I argue that εὐφυΐα is the highest form of natural virtue because it closely resembles virtue in the proper sense (ἀρετὴ κυρία).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".