Substances of religious semantics in ia, -ie in Russian the second half of the XVIII - the first quarter of the XIX centuries (on the material of civil printing dictionaries)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the problem of reflecting non-specific and specific names of religious semantics in the Russian language picture of the world of the second half of the 18 th - first quarter of the 19 th centuries on the example of one of the main layers of the vocabulary of the Russian language – substances on -ia, -ie, marked as heading lexemes in the works of Russian lexicography of the civil press. During the study, methods of linguotextological, component, historical-etymological, morphemic and word-forming analysis, as well as a statistical method were used. In the work, the nouns of religious semantics on -ia, -ie are analyzed in word-forming, lexical-grammatical, semantic and historical-etymological aspects. The analysis revealed the ability of the analyzed substances on -ia, -ie to be related in word formation to different types of foundations, as well as the productivity and ambiguity of the -ijsuffix for this word production. This formant, as the study showed, could participate in the formation of substances of religious semantics of different lexico-grammatical categories that have a complex thematic organization. Most of these derivatives in the civil dialect of the second half of the 18 th - first quarter of the 19t h centuries. belonged to monosemantic two-root lexemes with Greek equivalents and formed from nominal and verbal stems. As in Old Russian and modern Russian, the bulk of the analyzed substances belong to abstract vocabulary, while the most developed system of names and a large semantic variety are characterized by derivatives with the meaning of action. It has been established that the nouns of religious semantics on -ia, -ie in their entirety form one of the significant layers of vocabulary of the Orthodox doctrine in the Russian language picture of the world in the second half of the 18 th - first quarter of the 19 th centuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".