MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B015: Impact of sun sensitivity and ultraviolet radiation on the association between blistering sunburns and keratinocyte carcinoma

2025· article· en· W7113906340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunburnConfidence intervalSkin cancerBasal cellBasal cell carcinomaCancerCohortLifetime risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Importance Given the large and growing burden of keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) in the United States, there is a pressing need to identify individuals at high risk. Objective To quantify the association between KC risk and history of blistering sunburns in childhood and adulthood and to investigate whether individual sun sensitivity and other measures of ultraviolet radiation modify these associations. Design We examined blistering sunburns and KC risk in the nationwide U.S. Radiologic Technologists cohort study. Baseline data (1983-2005) on lifetime sunburn history and sun sensitivity traits were collected via self-administered questionnaires. Participants were followed until the diagnosis of a first primary cancer or completion of a follow-up questionnaire (2012-2014). Setting United StatesParticipants Radiologic technologists without a prior cancer who reported White race or Hispanic ethnicity and completed both the baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Exposures History of blistering sunburns before (childhood) and after (adulthood) age 15 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Risk increase for basal and squamous cell carcinoma (BCC/SCC) per blistering sunburn. Results Among 40,204 radiologic technologists (2% Hispanic; mean age at baseline:56 years), those reporting at least one blistering sunburn had a 37% higher risk of BCC and a 41% higher risk of SCC. The risk of BCC increased by 6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5-7) and 5% (95% CI, 4-6) for each childhood and adulthood blistering sunburns, respectively. Similar findings were observed for SCC, with risk increasing by 8% (95% CI, 6-11) and 7% (95% CI, 5-9) for childhood and adulthood blistering sunburns, respectively. These associations were not significantly modified by most individual sun sensitivity traits and other measures of ultraviolet radiation. Conclusions and Relevance Individuals with ≥5 blistering sunburns occurring across varying ages of exposure appear to be at particularly high risk for KCs and may benefit from heightened skin cancer surveillance. Citation Format: Belinda L. Gorsuch, Jim Z. Mai, Martha S. Linet, Michael R. Sargen, Mark P. Little, Bruce H. Alexander, Cari M. Kitahara, Elizabeth K. Cahoon. Impact of sun sensitivity and ultraviolet radiation on the association between blistering sunburns and keratinocyte carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr B015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207