MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113914820 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1698424

The effect of childhood maltreatment on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents with bipolar disorder: the mediating role of dysfunctional attitudes and the moderating role of social support

2025· article· en· W7113914820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysfunctional familySocial supportCognitionPsychological interventionMechanism (biology)Poison controlSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Childhood maltreatment has been consistently associated with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are especially vulnerable to early adversity and self-injurious behaviors; however, the mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. Among Chinese patients with BD, this study tested whether dysfunctional attitudes mediate the association between childhood maltreatment and NSSI and whether social support moderates this association. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 838 clinically diagnosed bipolar disorder patients (68.1% female; median age = 16 years). Measures included the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-A), Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory-Chinese Revised Edition (OSIC), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24). Descriptive analyses, correlations, mediation, and moderated mediation models were tested using SPSS 26.0 and Mplus 8.3, with robust maximum likelihood estimation (MLR) and 5,000 bootstrap resamples. Results: In our clinical sample of patients with bipolar disorder, 68.5% reported nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Childhood maltreatment was positively associated with both dysfunctional attitudes and NSSI. Mediation analysis demonstrated that dysfunctional attitudes partially mediated the association between childhood maltreatment and NSSI (indirect effect β = 0.040, 95% CI [0.017, 0.061], p < 0.01), accounting for 18.2% of the total effect. Moderation analysis further indicated that social support significantly attenuated the association between dysfunctional attitudes and NSSI (interaction β = -0.082, 95% CI [-0.162, -0.015], p < 0.05), but did not moderate the associations of childhood maltreatment with either dysfunctional attitudes or NSSI. Conclusion: Childhood maltreatment increases the risk of NSSI in patients with BD both directly and indirectly through dysfunctional attitudes, while social support mitigates the behavioral impact of dysfunctional attitudes on NSSI. These findings highlight dysfunctional attitudes as a cognitive mechanism and social support as a conditional protective factor, underscoring the importance of childhood maltreatment screening, cognitive restructuring, and support-enhancing interventions in reducing NSSI risk among Chinese patients with bipolar disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207