Familiaring the Gay, Queering the Family. Coming out and resilience in Mambo Italiano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores how two Italian-Canadian families negotiate<br/>the coming out of their sons in the film Mambo italiano, a comedy/<br/>drama released in 2003 and set in Montreal, Canada. The Italian-<br/>Canadian protagonist, Angelo, after years of living in the closet,<br/>decides to tell his parents he is gay, outing at the same time his<br/>Italian-Canadian lover, Nino, and provoking initially strong and<br/>vexed reactions in their respective families. Although full of stereotypes<br/>and cliches on ethnicity and gender identities, and following<br/>closely the so-called coming-out films’ genre, arguably concerned<br/>with positive representations of gay coming-out experiences, the<br/>film portrays the ironic, creative, and interesting ways in which<br/>these Italian-Canadian families negotiate a coming out despite the<br/>homophobic prejudices they are imbued with. Moving from studies<br/>of family resilience, this article argues that the major strategies used<br/>for integrating gayness into the family are drawn from the resources<br/>available to (post)migrant families. These are the use of rituals and<br/>the adaptation of ethnic schemata to new realities in order to cope<br/>with the unfamiliar, and the ability to envision family as an evolving<br/>and changeable reality, as this capability and the hope for a<br/>better future is what had sustained the survival of migrants in a<br/>hostile land. These considerations are backed up with reference to<br/>Italian-Canadian and Italian-North/American gay, lesbian, and<br/>bisexual (GLB) writers, whose concerns are similar to those found<br/>in Mambo italiano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".