MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114782072 · doi:10.15162/2704-8659/2374

INDIGENOUS DISCURSIVE ACTIVISM AGAINST EPISTEMIC OPPRESSION. TRANSMEDIA (HI)STORYTELLING AS A THEORY-PRACTICE FRAMEWORK FOR RADICAL RESURGENCE

2025· article· it· W7114782072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversità degli Studi di Bari · 2025
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCognitive reframingNarrativePoliticsDecolonialityStorytellingContext (archaeology)Problematization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This proposal starts from the assumption that Indigenous transmedia storytelling offers both a context and an analytical opportunity for reframing theories and practices of decoloniality. From dismantling settler-colonial narrative regimes to problematising neocolonial scopic orders through native transmedia activism, this contribution endeavours to challenge regime-made socio-cultural tropes for the purposes of a re-politicisation of Michi Saagiig Nishnaabeg epistemologies. Indigenous literary production more broadly is deeply informed by Native Americans’ holistic engagement with their intellectual, political, artistic and spiritual life (Simpson 2017), reflecting the way in which the ontological foundations of their intelligence systems are embedded in a multi-layered process of knowledge production. Within the context of Nishnaabeg intellectualism, the definition of radical resurgence – understood as a comprehensive change rather than a violent act (ibidem) – may seem redundant. However, this redundancy is justified, as Western thought compartmentalises the cultural and political spheres as mutually exclusive aspects of public life. For this reason, the term cultural (resurgence) fails as a consistent modifier, as it undermines Indigenous claims of dispossession and erasure as political issues. Therefore, drawing on the theoretical framework of decoloniality (Mignolo 2009; Geniusz 2009; Smith 2012; Tuck & Yang 2012), this contribution aims to investigate transmedia Indigenous narratives as conduits for local-cultural knowledge production and global visibility through epistemic recognition. It does so by examining the works of Nishnaabeg scholar and artist from Canada Leanne Betasamosake Simpson: the genre-blending novel Noopiming: The Cure for White Ladies (2020), which significantly influenced her digital album Noopiming Sessions, and was at the same time informed by her video-poem How to Steal a Canoe (2016). The selected case studies represent compelling manifestations of how Indigenous content is inherently remixable, exemplifying non-dichotomous approaches to knowledge-building processes, and embodying Indigenous “grounded normativity” – that is, how Native Americans’ land-based knowledge shapes their reciprocal and non-exploitative commitment to the world (Coulthard 2014). Thus, serving as a ‘cultural activator’ (Jenkins 2008, p. 101), Indigenous – and specifically Anishinaabe – transmedia storytelling fosters self-representational narratives, positioning them as practices of active citizenship oriented toward sociocultural, political, and eco-aesthetic resurgence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversità degli Studi di BariSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207