MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114824161

Using the quadrupole scan technique to measure the electron emittance in the booster-to-storage ring transfer line at the canadian light source

2025· article· en· W7114824161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorage ringSynchrotron light sourceSynchrotron radiationTransfer lineParticle acceleratorBooster (rocketry)Linear particle acceleratorCathode rayBeam (structure)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Light Source is a third generation synchrotron light source with an electron energy of 2.9 GeV on the University of Saskatchewan campus in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It consists of three accelerators: a linear accelerator, the Booster Ring, and the Storage Ring. There are two transfer lines that move the electron beam between accelerators to finally circulate in the Storage Ring. In the Storage Ring the electron beam produces synchrotron light to 24 photon beamlines; 22 user beamlines for various experiments and 2 diagnostic beamlines. In the injection process, approximately one third of the electron beam is lost from the Booster Ring to the Storage Ring in the Booster-to-Storage Ring transfer line. To mitigate radiation damage to components in the Storage Ring from the lost electrons and potential secondary radiation caused from collisions, the beam is intentionally scraped away in well shielded areas in the transfer line. The extracted beam from the Booster Ring historically has not been well understood and, by extension, the beam propagating through the transfer line and captured in the Storage Ring has not been well understood either. Measuring the properties and better understanding the electron beam being extracted from the Booster Ring is the beginning of the process to attempt to reduce the losses in the transfer line and work towards increasing the injection efficiency into the Storage Ring. This thesis presents these measurements to better understand the electron beam extracted from the Booster Ring. Purposely designed diagnostic cameras and two quadrupoles, a focusing and a defocusing, were used in the Booster-to-Storage Ring transfer line for the quadrupole scan measurements such that both the horizontal and vertical emittances could be measured individually. Both quadrupoles were also utilized for 2D raster scans that measured both the horizontal and vertical emittances together. An estimated emittance in the Booster Ring was also measured using a combination of images of the synchrotron radiation produced by the Booster Ring and simulated beam values. These emittances measured were then compared to expected theoretical emittances of the Booster Ring based on the lattice design. Some supplementary measurements were done alongside the quadrupole scans that are included in this thesis. The polarity of the quadrupoles were checked to ensure they were as expected. The beam was steered through different positions of the quadrupoles to see if there were non-linear impacts. This lead to learning the steering magnets in the transfer line can have a large impact on the beam in the Booster Ring. The same quadrupole scan techniques were used to measure the emittance of electron beam from the new linear accelerator installed at the Canadian Light Source as part of the commissioning process. The measured emittances are close to the expected theoretical emittances, indicating that this is not the culprit for the losses in the transfer line. Though the emittances do not explain the electron beam losses in the Booster-to-Storage Ring transfer line, the measurements are still important in the process of better understanding the beam that is extracted from the Booster Ring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207