MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114904941 · doi:10.47536/jcrm.v26i1.1082

Evaluation of low breaking‐strength and acoustic on‐demand fishing gear to mitigate entanglements of North Atlantic right whales in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence snow crab fishery

2025· article· W7114904941 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of cetacean research and management. Special issue · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsBuoyRopeFishingBycatchTension (geology)Lift (data mining)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding methods to mitigate the risk and severity of North Atlantic right whale entanglements in fishing gear is increasingly urgent as these endangered whales use the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (sGSL) as a summer feeding ground. In collaboration with snow crab fishers in the sGSL, we measured the tension of buoy lines while hauling traps, field tested the hauling of low breaking‐strength gear, and explored the use of on‐demand gear to avoid deploying vertical buoy lines. With conventional buoy lines, 40% of the hauling events reached maximum tensions of 7.56 kN (kiloNewtons; 1,700 lbf) or more during regular fishing operations. When evaluating methods to reduce the tension of buoy lines while lifting single traps, we found that the use of a hydraulic tension limiter to maintain low tension was effective and relatively easy to retro‐fit to existing vessels. Four types of weak gear configurations were tested in sea trials using a hydraulic load tension limiter: (1) buoy lines consisting of weak rope throughout; (2) buoy lines consisting of regular rope with inserts of either weak rope, (3) breakaway sleeves or (4) links, with the only gear modification parting being sleeves. The tension needed to break weak rope reduced after being used to lift a trap six times. During the 2022 fishing season, 300 trawls (strings of multiple traps) were hauled by 19 fishers using on‐demand gear in areas closed to conventional buoyed line fishing gear, with a total catch of > 203 tonnes, representing the first commercial application of this technology in Canadian waters. While 94% of the deployed sets were retrieved without grappling, only 65% of them were recovered after sending a single trigger signal from a mobile application. For this technology to be widely implemented, the trigger success rate must be improved. We measured elevation profiles of model groundlines with different proportions of sinking and positively buoyant rope and proportions of excess length at different current speeds. Our results support the use of sinking groundline to achieve low arc heights above the seafloor for on‐demand fishing using trawls. We believe that the collaborative framework applied in this study was effective in engaging fishers to apply innovative practices to reduce the risk and severity of right whale entanglements with snow crab fishing gear in the sGSL. The feedback provided by fishers helped define our methods and ensure their practical application. Moreover, this initiative strengthened international synergies, fostering collaboration between scientists, industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies to accelerate the adoption of whale‐safe fishing practices on a broader scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of cetacean research and management. Special issueSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207