1mpul50 Manifesto: Conceptual Foundations for a Global Territorial Resilience Movement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Manifiesto 1mpul50 establece las bases conceptuales, filosóficas y operativas para un movimiento global orientado a la resiliencia territorial, la autosuficiencia comunitaria y la transición hacia economías solidarias y post-crecimiento.El documento presenta los fundamentos del enfoque 1mpul50, sus principios rectores, su arquitectura conceptual y una hoja de ruta para impulsar innovaciones sociales, ecológicas y tecnológicas que fortalezcan comunidades frente al cambio climático, la disrupción económica y la vulnerabilidad sistémica. Este Manifiesto sintetiza investigaciones, prácticas y desarrollos metodológicos acumulados entre 1995 y 2025 en torno a prosumidores, monedas sociales, trueque multirrecíproco, autogestión territorial y modelos híbridos de economía colaborativa.Su objetivo es ofrecer un marco estratégico replicable que facilite la acción colectiva, la articulación de redes locales y la transformación comunitaria con alto impacto social y baja huella ecológica. El texto constituye la piedra angular del Movimiento 1mpul50, una referencia para investigadores, decisores públicos, organizaciones de base y redes de innovación social comprometidas con construir futuros más resilientes, equitativos y regenerativos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".