Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer: Leaps and Hurdles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The JAK/STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription) signaling pathway transfers signals at the surface of cell membranes to the nucleus, triggering the expression of a myriad of factors implicated in immunity, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Owing to this central role in cell homeostasis, its dysregulation is extensively reported in tumorigenesis, particularly in hematological cancers, justifying the development of specific inhibitors. It has more recently also been implicated in the development of solid cancers, including breast cancer. However, so far, clinical trials testing drugs targeting actors of JAK/STAT signaling yielded disappointing results, advocating in favor of a better understanding of this pathway in breast cancer. Herein, we exhaustively reviewed the current tools available to target this pathway in clinical trials and we offer several perspectives to gain further insight into the role of JAK2 in breast cancer and more particularly in the resistance to endocrine therapy in hormone-dependent breast cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".