Open Heart Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Heart Valves for Severe Mitral Annular Calcification—A Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitral annular calcification makes conventional mitral valve surgery extremely challenging and has led to growing interest in less invasive alternatives such as transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Alongside percutaneous approaches, some centers have explored open transatrial implantation of transcatheter heart valves in patients with heavily calcified annuli. This systematic review examines the current evidence on this hybrid "valve-in-MAC" technique, tracing its clinical evolution, technological refinements, patient outcomes, and ongoing debates. Key themes emerging from the literature include the adaptation of existing balloon-expandable and mitral-specific devices to the complex anatomy of calcified mitral annuli, the open transatrial approach as a safer alternative to extensive surgical debridement, and advances in imaging and device design aimed at reducing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and paravalvular leak. Persistent uncertainties remain, particularly regarding patient selection, long-term valve performance, and comparisons with conventional surgical repair or replacement. Although open transatrial implantation appears technically feasible and provides favorable hemodynamic results compared with fully percutaneous procedures, reported 30-day mortality remains high (approximately 19-27%). This reflects the advanced age, frailty, and multiple comorbidities typical of this patient group rather than procedural shortcomings. Current evidence is limited, with few comparative studies and little data on valve durability. Future work should prioritize multicenter prospective registries and well-designed comparative studies to better define the role of this emerging salvage strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".