MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115035624

Engineering human-scale perfusable tissues for diabetes cell therapy using 3D printing

2024· dissertation· en· W7115035624 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMichigan Diabetes Research Center, University of MichiganWellcome TrustCentre québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnelsDiabète QuébecCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusCell therapy3D printingTissue engineeringAnimal model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pluripotent stem cell-derived beta cells have emerged as a potentially unlimited supply of therapeutic cells that can be used to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D). Encapsulation device designs have been envisioned to transplant these cells while assuring safety to the recipient and graft function. Although many designs have succeeded in reversing T1D in rodents and small animals, consistently replicating the same therapeutic effect in humans has been challenging. The scaling up of beta cell transplantation devices introduces challenges in mass transport, specifically in oxygenation and insulin distribution. This thesis focuses on how 3D printing can help us better address these hurdles, specifically through the development of biofabrication techniques and tissue culturing tools for vascularized devices. Two approaches in fabricating sacrificial templates for the vascularization of beta cell-laden hydrogels were studied. The first 3D prints the template out of carbohydrate glass and casts the hydrogel and cells around it, while the second uses embedded 3D printing to construct the template inside of the cell-laden hydrogel. For the first approach, the thermophysical properties of sugar glass inks were characterized and later optimized for freeform extrusion 3D printing. This work led to the development of a sucrose-based formulation with the capacity to 3D print centimeter-scale, self-supporting sacrificial templates that could be used to create perfusable hydrogels. Next, an in vitro perfusion system for the culture of centimeter-scale artificial tissue constructs was engineered. This platform was used to study the oxygenation, viability, and function of prominent beta cell encapsulation configurations, with or without internal vascularisation. In the second approach to engineer vascularized pancreatic tissues, a self-healing alginate matrix was engineered and used to streamline the creation of centimeter-scale cell-laden hydrogels with intricate vascular networks. Beta cells, including stem cell-derived islets, within these tissue constructs remained functional after being cultured under perfusion for up to 25 days in vitro. Overall, these advancements in 3D printing and biofabrication technology could be used to design and evaluate clinical scale vascularized beta cell-laden tissues and other bioartificial organ systems

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207