MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115038922

Phonon Transport in Disordered Two-Dimensional Graphene

2025· dissertation· en· W7115038922 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsPhononGrapheneThermal conductivityWork (physics)Graphene nanoribbons
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employ molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, equipped with a machine-learned interatomic potential, to examine the impact of structural disorder on phonon transport in two-dimensional graphene. By generating amorphous structures through Monte Carlo methods, we systematically investigate how defects modify thermal conductivity and vibrational properties. Our findings demonstrate that a minimal defect concentration of 0.2% significantly degrades thermal conductivity: the out-of-plane component declines by over an order of magnitude, while the in-plane component decreases by half. Spectral analyses reveal that low-frequency flexural acoustic (ZA) modes, which predominantly govern heat transport in pristine graphene, are substantially suppressed in defective samples. In defective graphene, the mean free paths of ZA phonons are reduced by approximately half an order of magnitude compared to pristine graphene, with this reduction exceeding that of in-plane phonon modes; however, the decrease is not preferentially biased toward low frequencies as initially hypothesized. Furthermore, only minor localization effects are observed at low frequencies (PPR ≈ 0.9). These observations suggest a more complex scenario, implying that defects may preferentially disrupt normal scattering processes at low frequencies, potentially necessitating a deeper examination of hydrodynamic effects

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicThermal properties of materials→French-language works237,207→