MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115060105 · doi:10.30738/jipg.vol6.no2.a19377

Differentiated Learning Innovation Assisted by Wordwall Media in Mathematics Learning

2025· article· W7115060105 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Profesi Guru (JIPG) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline Learning Methods and Innovations
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmQualitative researchCooperative learningQualitative analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to examine differentiated learning innovation assisted by Wordwall media in mathematics learning in grade VI of state elementary school Banyumanik 03. The main problem identified is the low motivation and participation of students in mathematics learning materials. To overcome this, a differentiated learning approach was developed that adapts to the learning styles and needs of students, with the support of Wordwall as an interactive medium to increase engagement and enthusiasm for learning. This study used a qualitative method with a case study approach involving 28 sixth-grade students. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and analysis of learning outcomes. The results showed that the implementation of differentiated learning assisted by Wordwall significantly increased student motivation and participation in learning, as indicated by an increase in the average learning outcome score from 56 to 90. In addition, the use of Wordwall also helped teachers in classroom management and provided more effective feedback. Inovasi Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbantuan Media Wordwall dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji inovasi pembelajaran berdiferensiasi berbantuan media Wordwall dalam pembelajaran matematika di kelas VI SDN Banyumanik 03. Permasalahan utama yang diidentifikasi adalah rendahnya motivasi dan partisipasi peserta didik terhadap materi pembelajaran matematika. Untuk mengatasinya, dikembangkan pendekatan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi yang menyesuaikan gaya dan kebutuhan belajar peserta didik, dengan dukungan Wordwall sebagai media interaktif guna meningkatkan keterlibatan dan semangat belajar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus yang melibatkan 28 peserta didik kelas VI. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan analisis hasil belajar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi berbantuan Wordwall dapat meningkatkan motivasi dan partisipasi belajar peserta didik secara signifikan, yang ditunjukkan oleh peningkatan nilai rata-rata hasil belajar dari 56 menjadi 90. Selain itu, penggunaan Wordwall juga membantu guru dalam pengelolaan kelas dan pemberian umpan balik yang lebih efektif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Profesi Guru (JIPG)Same topicOnline Learning Methods and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207