Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops terrestris Wharton, 1983 Figs 54–55 Illidops terrestris Wharton, 1983: 667–670, figs 1–4. Type material Paratypes UNITED STATES – California • 1 ♀; Thousand Palms; 21 Mar. 1955; W.R.M. Mason leg.; CNC, CNCHYM 01520. – Florida • 1 ♀; Oneco; 4 Jun. 1953; J.C. Martin leg.; CNC, CNCHYM 01521. – Texas • 1 ♀; Kerrville; 19 Jun. 1959; W.R.M. Mason leg.; CNC, CNCHYM 01522 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 17 Jun. 1959; CNC, CNCHYM 01523. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of habitus photos of the holotype (available via the Smithsonian Website), our examination of a female paratype stored at the CNC, and the information available in Wharton (1983). → ***. Ecology / host information Parts of the type series (including holotype) reared from Pyralidae: Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller, 1848). For more details see Wharton (1983). Distribution NEA: United States (CA, FL, GA, TX). Molecular data Currently, only a very short fragment of COI (164 bp) of a female paratype CNCHYM 01520 stored at the CNC is available for this species. When blasted, it matches a public sequence with the Specimen-ID BIOUG02764-D01 in BIN BOLD:ABY3260 at a similarity of 99.33%. Specimen BIOUG02764-D01 was collected in Florida and all four sequences in the BIN were obtained from specimens collected in the United States, which matches the known distribution range of the species. We consider it likely that these specimens are representatives of I. terrestris but have not seen the material to confirm our hypothesis. Remarks Holotype female, USNM. Country of type locality: United States. The type was examined by Fernandez-Triana et al. (2020). This species was reared from a Pyralidae host, Elasmopalpus lignosellus, associated with peanut (holotype) and from Elasmopalpus sp. associated with cowpea (some paratypes).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.083 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".