MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115070696 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17922347

Illidops cloelia

2025· article· W7115070696 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicLeech Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsCNIB Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeHost (biology)Type (biology)GenusClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illidops cloelia (Nixon, 1965) Fig. 16 Apanteles cloelia Nixon, 1965: 183–184, fig. 211. Other material examined GERMANY – Bavaria • 1 ♀; Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Zugspitze, Platt; 47.407° N, 11.008° E; 2005 m a.s.l.; 18 Jul.–2 Aug. 2018; D. Doczkal and J. Voith leg.; Malaise trap; bulk ID: dv.zugsp5.3; obere Grenze Latschengebüsch, kleinräumiges Mosaik mit Zwergstrauchheide und (sub-)alpinen Rasen; SNSB-ZSM, ZSM-HYM-42389-G08. Species concept The type was examined by Fernandez-Triana et al. (2020). Our species concept is based on the information available in Nixon (1965, 1976) and Papp (1981) and the specimens we identified as this species based on morphology, including their associated molecular data. This species is morphologically rather unique → **. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Austria, Germany, Hungary, Korea, Russia (E, NC), Slovakia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, former Yugoslavia. Molecular data Molecular data: BOLD:AEO8223. Remarks Holotype female, NHMUK. Country of type locality: Switzerland. For more details see Höcherl et al. (2024). A male specimen of I. cloelia identified by Nixon should be stored at SNSB-ZSM as part of the Haeselbarth collection; however we were unable to locate or examine it as the collection underwent construction during the time of this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLeech Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207