Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops buteonis (Kotenko, 1986) Fig. 15 Apanteles buteonis Kotenko in Tobias & Kotenko, 1986: 756 [424]. Type material Holotype UKRAINE – Donetsk Region • ♀; Kramatorsk District, Kryva Luka; 48.87° N, 37.90° E; 79 m a.s.l.; 22 Jul. 1982; A. Kotenko leg.; SIZK. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of photos of the holotype and the information available in Tobias & Kotenko (1986) → ***. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Russia (S), Ukraine. Molecular data No molecular data available. Remarks This species is part of the I. naso complex of morphologically cryptic species (more detailed information in the remarks for I. naso). Tobias & Kotenko (1986: 756) used a set of characters to distinguish I. buteonis from I. contortus (junior synonym of I. naso): “Middle field of 2 nd abdominal tergite less narrowed toward base, its posterolateral angles almost straight. First abdominal tergite shorter and wide, usually less narrowed toward apex. Wings smoky. Ovipositor valves slightly shorter than hind tibia.” We analyzed the T2 shape of various specimens of barcoding clusters morphologically matching these three very similar species, more details can be found above discussing this character. In addition to that, the characterization of T1 shape is not very exact and the wings do not appear more infumate than in the other species, as well as ovipositor sheaths being shorter than the hind tibia (the latter two characters are not repeated in the other side of the couplet).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".