Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops nigritegula (Tobias & Kotenko, 1986) Apanteles nigritegula Tobias & Kotenko, 1986: 755 [425]. Species concept Our species concept is based on the information available in Tobias (1964) and Tobias & Kotenko (1986). In addition to that, the species is quite morphologically distinct and unlikely to be confused. → **. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Kazakhstan, Russia (S). Molecular data No molecular data available. Remarks Type and depository unknown. Country of type locality: Kazakhstan. This species was formally described by Tobias & Kotenko (1986). Prior to that, Tobias (1964) regarded it as a variety of A. electilis, describing it as A. electilis var. nigritegula nov. (Tobias, 1964), providing more detailed information on the potential type locality that did not make it into the 1986 key. We translated this information, the locality indicated by Tobias (1964: 227) is: “Tselinograd Region: Kokshetau Mountains, on flowers of Ferula songorica, 15 VI 1957, 2 females (V. Tobias)”. This is one of the very few species of Illidops with a large pale spot from the base to beyond the middle of the pterostigma, in addition it is rather small, measuring only 1.9–2.2 mm (Tobias & Kotenko 1986: 755).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".