MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115185052 · doi:10.1117/12.3074664

Deflection measurements in soft structures with optical fiber specklegram sensor

2025· article· W7115185052 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)Optical fiberActuatorSpeckle patternDecoupling (probability)Multi-mode optical fiberMicroelectromechanical systemsFiber optic sensorStrain gauge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft robots fabricated from biocompatible and biodegradable materials, such as hydrogels, are breakthrough technologies for biomedical and environmental applications, including minimally invasive surgeries and drug delivery systems. Agar offers advantages such as thermal reversibility, edibility, and controllable optical and mechanical properties. However, the integration of sensing systems into such actuators remains limited, impairing the implementation of feedback control strategies. Therefore, this study explores multimode optical fibers as embedded sensors to measure angular deformation in agar-based structures with two degrees of freedom. Controlled mechanical stimuli were applied to both the base and tip of the soft device, while output fiber speckle patterns were acquired by a CCD camera. Evaluating the cross-correlation between reference and test speckle images provided quantification of angular displacements &theta;<sub>1</sub> and &theta;<sub>2</sub>. Linear regression calibration models yielded reliable measurement of angular responses by decoupling simultaneous deformations. This proof-of-concept study contributes to photonics and soft robotics-related areas by establishing biodegradable systems instrumentation with integrated optical sensing capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207