Comparative Family Law by FL-EUR:First Results and Working Methods on Vulnerable Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In what ways does contemporary European family law respond to evolving societal dynamics and the growing imperative to uphold human rights? This volume addresses this question by taking a crossnational, comparative approach, presenting research that examines how family law norms are shaped across Europe. The publication stems from a landmark scholarly conference held in Stockholm in October 2024 — the first of its kind to bring together a wide network of family law scholars and research groups from across Europe. In the spirit of enhancing a transnational dialogue and mutual understanding, several of the most pressing legal issues are identified and analysed using refined methodological approaches.Three central themes have emerged as focal points for ongoing and future enquiry:1. The transformation of parent-child relationships, particularly in relation to new forms of assisted reproductive technology (ART), with a focus on the interests of the child (to be born) and shifting definitions of legal parentage.2. The legal recognition of gender and new forms of adult relationships, including non-romantic and community-based arrangements.3. Enhancing legal protections against domestic violence with a particular focus on safeguarding the rights and well-being of children.This volume contributes to the development of a more coherent and principled European family law system, based on comparative research and shared normative principles. It provides an invaluable source of inspiration and reference for academics, legal professionals and policymakers dedicated to advancing family law in an evolving Europe.Elektronische versie beschikbaar op :Strada lex BelgiëStrada lex LuxemburgStrada lex EuropaHeeft u een abonnement? Activeer kosteloos de digitale versie dankzij de code in het boek.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".