MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115387844

ПЛЕМІННІ ГНІЗДА ПОСЕЛЕНЬ СХІДНОТШИНЕЦЬКОЇ КУЛЬТУРИ XV–XII СТ. ДО Н. Е.

2025· article· uk· W7115387844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandHuman settlementSlavic languagesPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)Middle AgesBronze Age
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 70s - 80s of the 20th century it was proven that the ancestral homeland of the Slavs is located between the Vistula and the Dnieper in the territory inhabited by the tribes of the Trzciniec-Komariv culture. The Eastern Trzciniec culture occupies the northern part of Ukraine. In the west it borders on the Trzciniec culture of Poland, in the north it passes along the Pripyat and Desna, in the east it captures the lower reaches of the Sejm. The southern border runs along the Vinnytsia - Cherkasy line. In the third quarter of the 2nd millennium BC the ethnic and territorial situation in Ukraine stabilizes within the previously established borders. Nowadays, most archaeologists and linguists believe that the most ancient territory of the Proto-Slavs should be seen in Right-Bank Northern Ukraine and the adjacent area of the Left Bank, that is, precisely where the Eastern Trzciniec culture was widespread, including its Sosnytsia part. From that time until the Middle Ages, no significant population movements are archaeologically recorded. Geographical research of these territories by B. Rybakov showed that three maps: the Trzciniec, Early Przeworsk and Zarubynet cultures, - and the map of the Slavic culture of the Prague-Korchak type coincided remarkably. Verification of maps of the territories where the settlements of the Proto-Slavic tribes were located from the Late Bronze Age to the Middle Ages is the main idea of this article and a number of previous ones. For this, the author used the method of tribal geography, which is based on the analysis of the social structure of the Proto-Slavs, their division into clan and tribal communities and confirms the idea that the clan occupied a separate settlement, and the tribe formed a nest of related settlements. The purpose of the current study is to determine the social organization, tribal structure of the Proto-Slavs in the 15th - 12th centuries BC, based on archaeological materials with the involvement of ethnographic and linguistic sources. The object of the study is the social relations of the East-Szynski tribes under the tribal system. The subject of the study is the geography of the settlements of the East-Szynski tribes of the second half of the 2nd millennium BC in Eastern Europe. The use of registers, records of archaeological monuments and excavation materials by archaeologists in this study allowed us to localize on modern maps the territories of the nests of settlements of related clans that formed the Proto-Slavic tribes. The author mapped 73 nests of settlements of the East-Szynski tribes, including 46 nests of the Sosnytsia culture in the Kyiv, Volyn, Rivne, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv regions of Ukrainian Polissya, as well as in Southern Polissya of Belarus. That is, the territory of the Pripyat basin, which was inhabited by tribes of the East Shtynets culture (and the Sosnytsia culture as its part) is the oldest territory of habitation of the Proto-Slavs. Conclusions. The mapping of clusters of tribal settlements localized by the author on modern maps of Ukrainian and Belarusian Polissya allows us to record the coincidence of the territories where the Proto-Slavs lived during the Bronze Age, during the time of Herodotus and up to Nestor, which indicates the continuity of the settlement of Ukrainian Polissya by the Slavs, probably by our ancestors. In further research from era to era, the method of tribal geography will contribute to the identification of characteristic features of the social, cultural and economic life of the Slavs. Keywords: Proto-Slavs, clan, tribe, clusters of settlements, Eastern Trzciniec and Sosnytsia cultures, tribal geography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogySame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207