MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115597313 · doi:10.1002/pat.70475

Cellulose Acetate Ultrafiltration Membranes Engineered With Copper‐Based Metal Organic Frameworks for Enhanced Filtration and Antifouling Performance in Water Treatment

2025· article· en· W7115597313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers for Advanced Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
KeywordsMembraneCellulose acetateUltrafiltration (renal)Contact angleBiofoulingPermeationFiltration (mathematics)Humic acidCellulose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This research examines the filtration properties of a series of ultrafiltration membranes loaded with HKUST‐1 metal–organic framework (MOF) at three different concentrations in a cellulose acetate (CA) matrix. The HKUST‐1 was synthesized using the solvothermal method with copper (II) acetate monohydrate and trimesic acid as the organic linker. The HKUST‐1 was characterized through XRD, ATR‐FTIR, and SEM‐EDAX. The XRD pattern shows major peaks indicating the presence of copper and high crystallinity. The SEM image clearly displays the octahedral morphology of HKUST‐1, and EDX confirms the presence of copper, carbon, and oxygen. Functional group analysis by XRD and ATR‐FTIR confirms effective incorporation of HKUST‐1 into the CA membrane matrix. The porous morphology and smooth surface roughness of the CA/HKUST‐1 membranes were revealed by SEM and AFM. The permeation and hydrophilicity were evaluated in terms of pure water flux, water content, and water contact angle measurements. Results showed that the modified membranes had superior water permeation, foulant rejection, and antifouling performance compared to the neat membrane. The water contact angle decreased to as low as 36° for the CA‐1.0 membrane, indicating increased hydrophilicity due to HKUST‐1 addition to the CA matrix. Notably, the pure water flux (PWF) of the CA‐1.0 membrane (95.3 Lm −2 h −1 ) was approximately 3.5 times higher than that of the neat CA membrane (28.0 Lm −2 h −1 ). The favorable morphological features of the CA‐1.0 membrane facilitated rejection of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and humic acid (HA), with a flux recovery ratio (FRR) exceeding 90% indicating effective separation and improved antifouling properties. Additionally, the CA‐1.0 membrane demonstrated significantly antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus . These bench‐scale results are promising for the application of HUKST‐1 loaded UF membranes in effective water and wastewater treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it