MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115679921 · doi:10.71846/18-wcee-2026

POST-SEISMIC CAMPAIGN AFTER THE KAHRAMANMARAS 2023 SEQUENCE OF THE AFPS (FRENCH ASSOC EARTHQ. ENG)

2025· article· en· W7115679921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Conference of Earthquake Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAftershockSequence (biology)TowerBridge (graph theory)Earthquake engineeringQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the destructive earthquakes of the February 6th, 2023, an on-site mission organized by the French Association of Earthquake Engineering (AFPS), took place in southern Turkiye involving eleven French experts representing different institutions and organizations. The post-seismic campaign lasted from March, 31st to April, 9th 2023, when the group visited many sites presenting different damage levels, all located in the epicentral areas of the two mainshocks of the sequence. The main objective of this presentation is to highlight the contribution of in-situ dynamic measurements in understanding some observed phenomena. In particular, ambient vibrations were carried out in free-field and in some civil engineering structures. These measurements of dynamic parameters of the monitored soils and structures help to explain the variability and amplification of the two earthquakes ground motions, as well as their impact on buildings and other large-scale engineering structures, such as bridges, dams and cultural heritage. Regarding soil dynamics, they allow to assess the existence of lithological site effects in some of the urban areas heavily affected by the two mainshocks and the aftershock sequence (Çukurova quarter in Adana, Kirikhan, Islahiye and Antakya). Regarding the structures, several historical buildings (Clock Tower and Great Mosquee in the city center of Adana) and the ancient Misis bridge have been studied to understand their dynamical behavior by Operational Modal Analysis (OMA). During the visit to the large-scale arch-dam of Berke (50 km north of Osmaniye) where OMA has been carried out, a ML3.3 aftershock has been recorded by the three stations. Careful signal analysis allows the comparison of the dynamic response of the arch-dam under ambient vibrations, but also moderate seismic motion. A comparison with a previous OMA study of the same dam carried by Bayraktar et al. (2011) allows to discuss the observed frequency variations. These analysis highlight the benefits to carry out dynamic measurements that become complementary to visual and photography-based site investigations during post-seismic campaigns in lightly to moderately damaged areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Conference of Earthquake EngineeringSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207