Social Weather Stations Survey: 2013 Second Quarter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Area in Philippines (1); class of dwelling (1); household facilities (12); looking for employment (6); occupation (1); wage increase in past three months (1); type of employment (1); normal working hours per day in past week (3); minimum wage (1); live abroad (1); finding a job (2); working abroad (3); self-rated poverty (4); food poverty and expenses each month (4); hunger in last three months (2); Nutritional Guidelines for Filipinos (3); Mother's Class on nutrition (2); breastfeeding (5); problems regarding nutrition on mass media (5); effective government programs in reducing hunger (2); help in last three months (2); financial situation in past three months (4); television (1); radio (1); newspaper (1); primary language used at home (1); job availability (2); video or computer games (1); voter registration (1); voted in previous elections (2); interest in upcoming barangay election (2); head of household (1); feelings after interview (2); quality of life trend over last twelve months (2); economy of the Philippines (3); proud to be a Filipino (1); satisfaction with democracy in Philippines (1); democratic vs. authoritarian government (1); news events in past three months (10); President Benigno Aquino III (3); next President of the Philippines (2); job approval of government officials (18); senators and campaign promises (1); job approval of government institutions (9); performance ratings of present national administration on specific issues (16); Commission on Elections (6); performance ratings of institutions regarding May 2013 elections (6); Philippine National Police (3); attitudes towards elections (6); election results believable (4); election day experience (5); problems in May 2013 elections (9); awareness and trust ratings of individuals (3); awareness and trust ratings of countries (5); victim of crime (6); reporting of crime (9); trust in local police (3); K to 12 Basic Education Program (2); classroom shortage (2); quality of teachers (1); quality of public schools education (1); Department of Education corruption (1); tension between Philippines and Taiwan (2); safety (2); illegal drug addiction (1); trustworthiness of Muslims (1); peace between Moro Islamic Liberation Front and government (2); persons with disabilities (19); Lesbian, Gay, and Transgender Issues (6); most important to you and your family (1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.344 | 0.224 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".